Objectives: Recent
research suggests that evolutionary selection pressures have shaped
mental mechanisms to be able to assess one's own and other's physical
strength, fighting ability, and aggressiveness. According to the
recalibrational theory, anger may be linked to fighting ability and
serve as a bargaining mechanism to improve welfare obtained in social
conflict. We hypothesized that late adolescent men (but not
mid-adolescent men or women) use this mechanism, as it would be
particularly adaptive for them to avoid potential costs from direct
conflict in male competition.
Methods: The
present study investigated the relationship between fighting ability
(estimated from handgrip strength [HGS], a measure of upper body
strength, and self-reported fighting ability) and aggressiveness
(physical and nonphysical) in 288 Spanish adolescents aged 14–18 years.
Results: Our
results indicated a positive relationship between self-perceived
fighting ability and HGS in both sexes during adolescence. There was no
association between fighting ability and aggressiveness in late
adolescent women (17–18 years). For men, there was a positive
relationship between fighting ability and physical aggression, but the
strength of this relationship decreased with age. Additionally, for men,
there was a positive relationship between fighting ability and anger
but only in late adolescence, and thus arguing that for adolescent men
aggression strategies shift from physical to nonphysical as they age.
Conclusions: With
reference to the recalibrational theory of anger, our results suggest
that the sex- and age-dependent associations between fighting ability
and physical and nonphysical aggression indicate divergent adaptive
skills between sexes, which are driven by intrasexual competition. Am.
J. Hum. Biol., 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
1 comentario:
Excelente. Felicitaciones
Publicar un comentario